As more IVC filter lawsuits come to light, we are beginning to see even more unfavorable effects. These are potential problems that may occur after the filter has been inserted into the patient. This device that is thought to help catch blood clots has been reportedly causing some issues for patients, including moving devices, perforation, and more. Now, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has set forth warnings about the use of IVC filters. Their statement included more than 900 adverse events, some that are linked to the retrievable device being left in the patient longer than suggested or necessary.You can also browse http://www.bardfilterlawsuitcenter.com/ here to get more info on ivc filters.
Previous recommendations urged doctors to separate the filter from the patient within 29 to 54 days after it has been implanted. Prolong implantation can lead to serious side effects and health problems associated with the filter. The device can fracture, result in blood clots being allowed to move through the vein and towards the lungs and heart. This can occur in a pulmonary embolism, stroke, or even death. In some cases, the device is irretrievable, which can cause long-term risks to the patient.
The FDA provides their MedWatch portal where people can report the adverse events. This includes medical experts and patients alike. There are five main devices currently on the market that have been aimed including the Bard Recovery Filter, the Bard G2 Filter, the Bard G2 Express Filter, the Cook Gunther Tulip Filter, and the Cook Celect Filter. They are meant to be an alternative for patients who are at risk of blood clots but are unable to take blood thinners or anticoagulant medications. Determining who is liable if you have been hurt by an IVC filter can be difficult, but it usually falls on the manufacturer.